the things we think but do not say

talking the talk, design, connected, shoppingJuly 25, 2007 2:36 pm



iPhone details-0383

Originally uploaded by georgeaye.

I’m over the iPhone. For real.

For the weeks and months leading up to the release I was getting more and more convinced that my life would be pointless without the Jesus-phone in my hands.

Between the hype, the growing excitement, the slow leak of information and the tremendously in depth interaction videos released just days before it’s launch, the iPhone broke new ground all over the place.

I could blame the fact that I’m a designer or blame that fact that I have Golem-level desires for ‘precious’ objects, but I wanted this phone more than any other object in recent memory. It was getting unbearable to be without one in my possession.

But the weirdest thing happened. I got a chance to finally play with one the day after the launch, and I found myself realising a few things.

1. It’s amazing.
2. I don’t need it.
3. It’s amazing.

And then I took a breath and found myself totally over it. Honestly, I think that because I’d read and seen everything about it for so long the final meeting strangely held no more surprises for me. Somehow I’d over cooked my own enthusiasm for the damn thing.

I tried flicking my finger through iTunes album art, flicking my way through contacts, pinching and prising my way through photographs and Google maps. I even tried typing. They were all as amazing as I expected.

And while my argument for wanting it so bad, ‘it’s the most seamless integration of devices ever’, I realised that I just couldn’t get excited enough to replace all my current, separate devices. I have a phone. I have a music player, I even have crappy access to email through my phone too! Clearly with the iPhone the subtle, restrained industrial design makes it a pleasure to hold, but it’s really in the interaction design that makes this device come to life in your hands. But for me, $600 is a lot for me to pay to improve the ‘experience’.

While there has been a lot of research white papers and experimental prototypes shown of multi touch technology, more notable by Jeff Han from NYU, it was Apple who were the first to show how it could be really used and where the benefits were immediately obvious.

Let it be said, this is a totally landmark device here. It makes all other products that come anywhere near this category look so… pre-iPhone.

So while I happily recognise it’s immense awesomeness, for me I feel freed from its grasp. I’m over the iPhone. At least for the next few months…

ps.

Posing for me here is a friend’s iPhone. He was kind enough to let me take these closeups of this beautiful object. The full gallery is here. Enjoy!

social, photography, Chicago 10:52 am



Pitchfork 2007 Sunday-34214

Originally uploaded by georgeaye.

My little photo essay about the fans of Pitchfork went live earlier this week on Gapers’ Block. Wahoo!

As previously posted about on this blog, I wanted to present a photo story from the other side of the stage.

Check it out the Gapers’ Block slide show here.

design, travel, fashion, HubwearJuly 20, 2007 1:35 pm

It’s been a long time since I made any mention of Hubwear, but the site and the business is doing just fine. Sara, my girlfriend, partner and all round best-thing-in-my-life, has become a major part of the company and we’ve refocused and clarified a lot of what Hubwear means. We’ve got a brand spanking new site and it’s a hundred times clearer to navigate, explore and shop. It was a little too art house for mass consumption. Kudos to Sandy Weisz, our wonderful website designer.

But there’s more. Today I have fantastic news as Sara and I were interviewed in Gridskipper.com (the urban travel guide) the othere day and the post went live! We discuss at some length, in which city we’d like to be imprisoned :-) Odd question, it might seem, but it yielded some interesting questions about where we’d go to eat, shop, hang out. Thanks to Brittany Belgardt for the opportunity to talk.

As with any small business, one hopes that each year leads to new and a exciting opportunities. I have a good feeling that this year will be a good one for us.

design, photography, tech, shopping, ChicagoJuly 17, 2007 7:39 pm

As I mentioned in a previous post, I got myself a new camera body about a week ago and after some 5500 exposures I think I can give it a short assessment.

But before I get into that, I wanted to give a shout out to my favourite camera gear store in the city; Calumet Photographic. Not only do all their staff have a great amount of experience to impart, but they’re very good at scaling their knowledge appropriately, from teaching newbs like me, the basics of how to use a two head lighting kit to giving their recommendations on the latest pro gear. Plus they let you rent which makes things like $1700 lens seem a little more affordable.

Ok, back to the gear list:

Canon EOS 1D Mk III
Canon EF 16-35L f2.8 (rented)
Canon EF 24-70L f2.8 (rented)
Canon EF 70-200L f2.8 IS (rented)
Spare battery for 1DMk III
Four 4gb Lexar 133x CF memory cards
Domke F2 bag

So what worked and what didn’t? Actually, everything worked out great! The only time I had anything that was close to a equipment fault was due to my incompetence. I thought the auto focus on my 70-200 was broken, so I tried turning the body on and off a bunch of times, then mounting and unmounting the lens… then I remembered that there’s a switch on the lens itself that turns the AF off. Ugh.

After a full weekend of shooting, my favourite lens was the tremendously heavy 70-200L f2.8 IS. It had the reach I needed to get some great close ups of detailed facial expressions during the performance at Pitchfork but also has the added bonus of getting people to move out of your way, since it’s so freaking large. The lens is white and with the hood attached it’s about the length of my arm. Let me tell you, it’s very hard to dance along to De La Soul’s, “Rock Co.Kane Flow” with it hanging off your neck.
Pitchfork 2007 Sunday-34878

Ok, now onto the new body: it’s ridiculously good. I’ve never owned a tool that performed with such purpose and conviction. Almost every aspect of its design and operation has been optimized for the task at hand, and that task is always to get the shot: battery life is over 2500-3000 exposures per charge, ISO is readable in the viewfinder, the viewfinder is HUGE and bright, the vertical grip has a complete replication of the control layout, the blackout time in the viewfinder is a barely perceivable 80ms, and a huge array of custom functions to tweak and adjust the controls to your preferences.

Now there’s been a huge ruckus all over the internets about the new Auto Focus system built into the MKIII, and while I have yet to do any definitive tests, I am pretty satisfied with how it’s been behaving. A great source of relief to me so far, is how well placed many of the 45 AF points are laid out within the viewfinder.

How I learnt to focus on all my previous cameras is to find an element in the image that I want to focus on, then start the ‘Focus Lock and Recompose’ sequence. The focused element then doesn’t always fall in the dead centre of the image. I started using this process years ago and it’s totally instinctive now. But this technique just becomes a pain when you’re trying to compose a portrait where the subject isn’t used to holding still with a toothy grin on their face. I don’t want to be constantly, ‘Focus Lock and Recomposing’ on them either, as in that split second when I’m reorientating the camera, they might move their head and body and the shot will be thrown off. I just want there to be an AF point directly on the person’s eyes for a portrait and it want it to be placed so things look right proportionally when the camera is set into a vertical orientation. I guess that I could revert to manual focus to really make sure the AF doesn’t move around, but I don’t think that I could trust that I could react to a person’s movement quickly enough to guarantee that I got that tiny, subtle change in expression or glance of the eyes. The whole time I was shooting close ups of the artists at Pitchfork, I would change to the vertical grip, hit the ‘select AF point’ under my thumb then roll my index finger two clicks until it hits the upper most AF marker. Done. Shoot. Next shot.

Pitchfork 2007 Saturday-33833

One additional thing I noticed while using the Mk III was that I retrained my eyes to use a technique that I’d forgotten about since my first film camera, the Canon A1. Since there’s so much fast movement on stage at any one time it’s important to not be too blinkered looking through your viewfinder and miss something happening just out of the frame. My old film camera had a really expressive, bright viewfinder which I missed dearly when I moved to my Nikon D70. But since moving to the Mk III, I found that while I have this new viewfinder up against my right eye, I can once again open my left eye and let my mind blend the images together. This way I can ‘see’ through the lens while keeping a check on whatever else is happening on the stage with both eyes open quite naturally.

All in all, I’m very happy with the new body and when matched with some decent glass, it’s a formidable package.

social, photography, Chicago 9:09 am



Pitchfork 2007 Saturday-33495

Originally uploaded by georgeaye.

I wanted to share a collection of photos from this past weekend. This is a series of portraits taken during Pitchfork that tells the other side of the performances; the people who are there to watch, listen and experience the shows. I think it gives some context to the event and it reminds me that just because I wore a ‘press pass’, I’m still just a fan.

The slideshow starts here.

music, social, photography, ChicagoJuly 16, 2007 11:45 am

This weekend featured two new types of photography for me: on Friday night, my first proper wedding (where I didn’t know the couple at all) and then my first indie rock concert on Saturday and Sunday. All in all, I was taking photos, thinking of taking photos, and running to get to a new place to take photos for 72hrs.

While it was exciting to take photos at the wedding, it’s hard to compare it to a two day long concert where over 30 of the hottest bands are playing. I was lucky enough to be the photographer for Gapers Block (a Chicago centric webzine) which gave me the all important “Press Pass” to the gigs. And I can tell you I was surprised how many layers of ‘exclusivity’ there is. At the bottom is the lowly, ticker holding punter of course. Then there’s student volunteer crew members, then there’s the regular crew, then there’s the press, then there’s the press with yellow stickers (for photo access), then there’s VIP, then there’s security, then there’s Artist, and then there’s Pitchfork management that truly have ‘All Area Access’. Oh and there’s all manner of combinations too.

Pitchfork 2007 Saturday-33255

Despite the layered cake of permissions and access, my ‘press pass + yellow sticker’ did let get to places that I would never have seen in the past as a normal concert goer. This manifests itself mainly in the form of the ‘Press pit’ which is a rather sweaty way to call the gap of space caught between the main stage and the crowd. I don’t know if I ever noticed before, but if you’re all the way up the front of the crowd, you’ll see all the press photographers all running around switching lens or switching camera bodies trying to get the best line of sight. Since I’m not a ‘hardened veteran’ to all this yet, I spent more than a few moments at each stage, taking photos of the press crew as they would dive in and out of each others way. Somehow, instinctively each photographer knew just how much room they need to position themselves, get the shot and not be in someone else’s way at the same time. And naturally, it’s also the best place to see the band as you’re less than ten feet from the artists. Good for photographers and great for photographers who are also fans of the bands.

Pitchfork 2007 Saturday-33122

While this is might not be true at all concerts, the photography policy at Pitchfork was a strict, ‘first three songs’ limit. I still don’t have any idea why this was in place. But the effect put every photographer into an urgent rhythm It also means that you can’t arrive late, or you’ll be shooting from the crowd which could mean being back a couple of hundred feet. Not good. Even with a 70-200L f2.8 lens plus 1.4 tele-extender, you’re basically screwed for any getting any decent facial expressions.

And while this was true for the two main stages, Aluminum and Connector, all sorts of security breaches were happening at the Balance stage. The Balance stage for the last couple of years was treated as the runt of the litter, being off to the side of the main park. Last year, someone had the idea of providing shade for everyone in the sweltering temperature but unfortunately this only created a heat sink since the tent didn’t really let the steam produced by several thousand sweaty ravers to escape. Thankfully this year saw no tent.

All of Saturday, I soon realised that I could rely upon the guys on security at the Balance stage to let me and every other press photographer do their work. At any time, for as long as we wanted. We even got to go backstage where we could hang out with the artists, get a cold drink and very importantly, use their clean porta potty. None of the heavy handed security douche bags from the other two main stages were here. Just the cool ones. Yeah for the Balance stage! And all this sweet dealyness was going great for everyone involved until Dan Deacon played his set last Saturday afternoon, where everything went nuts.

Now remember that the layout goes like this: the band plays on the stage, then there’s a four foot wide gap where the press photographers shoot from, then the front of the crow starts and goes back hundreds of feet. Three distinct zones. But for Dan Deacon, this was way too conventional. He managed to play his set from within the crowd itself, right at the front, up against the fence. Unfortunately, I get only wind of this when I arrived late and there’s a road block of people all jammed up. I start to assert my ‘press pass’ powers and shove my way to the entrance. I then see what the deal is with Dan’s set and also see that all the press photographer’s are now jam packed in the press pit, shooting ‘backwards’ toward the crowd to get shots of Mr. Deacon. Which meant that it was SOL.

Then it hit me! The only place for me to go now is onto the stage! Since no one is using it, I might as well use it to give me a good overlooking vantage point. So I shove my way to the stage staircase with some other later press shooters who have the same idea. And this is where my luck came in. I’d made friends with one of the crew earlier that day and as we all approach, he say’s, “No one getting up on the stage. No photographers allowed.”

“I’m letting only two in. You and you. Go!”

I scramble up onto the stage, I take the closest corner and start to scope out the sprawling mess of activity in front of me and it’s just plain insane. Dan is screaming into a microphone, and completely surrounding him are three thousand people all going nuts hanging on his every word. Immediately below me, in the press pit is the rest of the press shooters fighting to get a clear shot of Dan and his iPod shuffle (no joke). And every second I’m up on stage shooting down into the crowd and Dan Deacon, I’m thinking two things, “I can’t believe what I’m seeing” and “If anyone gets hurt they won’t be found until the morning”.

Total, complete, chaos with a heavy electronic beat in the background. What an experience.

Pitchfork 2007 Saturday-33622

Pitchfork 2007 Saturday-33705

For the rest of the night and all of next day, the security tightened up like a drum and to over compensate for yesterday’s debacle, the security on the Balance stage started to enforce not only the three song limit, but a new ‘four photographer’s at a time’ rule. Great. So you’ve now got three songs, about 12 minutes, spread out over a dozen photographers who now have to take turns. That gives you about 60-90 seconds each.

What do these people want from me?

Since this is not a very sustainable situation and I have a full shot list from this one stage to do, I come up with a new strategy. A strategy that only a rookie like me could have come up with it seemed as I didn’t see anyone else try it.I remember thinking during the Girl Talk set the night before, the people in the crowd are in the best position to take photos since us photo chumps were stuck on the side lines waiting to be blessed with a minute of access. So I said, sod it, I’m joining the crowd!

It takes a lot of jostling, a lot of ‘excuse me!’ and a lot of not too subtle camera nudging to work my way through the crowd and eventually I find myself at the front of the crowd, right up against the low fence that previously separated me from the crowd. And let me tell you, life on the other side is totally different. Rather than fighting for a spot to shoot from, you’re fighting for room to jump around to. I think sometime after getting my fancy schmancy press pass, I forgot what it was like to just be a fan.

Pitchfork 2007 Sunday-34440

For the next four hours, I hung out with three thousand other fans and danced, screamed, jumped and took photos like everyone else, to The Cool Kids, Cadence Weapon, and The Field. The strategy only really paid off when the final show on the Balance stage was kicked in. Klaxons is a English rock band that is apparently making kids krazy everywhere they play. And due to the fact that everyone in the crowd was really, really into the band and going totally nuts when they started their set, security wasn’t letting any press take photos for at least the first two songs. Since I was already embedded as part of the crowd, they happily admitted that they couldn’t stop me from getting my shots of the band.

And while in theory this plan sounded smart, getting in focus shots of the band in near total darkness (shooting at ISO 3200) with the weight of thousands of fans crushing you against a metal railing while supporting 10lbs of camera and lens, is not easy. Eventually they let the press in but by then I was already done and ready to be extracted. Security was kind enough to pull me out of the crush. The night ended on De La Soul on the main stage, but I’m going to remember those Krazy Klaxon fans for a long time.

The artists featured are:
Saturday
Ken Vandermark’s Powerhouse Sound, Califone, William Parker Quartet, Grizzly Bear, Battles, Fujiya & Miyagi, Professor Muder, Clipse, Dan Deacon, Girl Talk, Yoko Ono
Sunday
Deerhunter, Fred Lonberg-Holm’s Lightbox Orchestra, Menomena, Junior Boys, Nomo, Sea and Cake, Jamie Lidell, The Cool Kids, Cadence Weapon, Klaxons, De La Soul

Pitchfork 2007 Sunday-34746

All in all, a throughly thrilling, fantastic, ear drum ringing weekend of photography.

A slideshow of photos from Saturday.

A slideshow from Sunday is now up!

photographyJuly 10, 2007 5:15 pm



Chicago Botanic Gardens-0771

Originally uploaded by georgeaye.

I’ve always found photography to be one of those areas of fascination that is a perfect balance of technical and aesthetic virtues. To learn and practice photography you have to understand just enough technique to be dangerous. Learning a new aspect to your vision or a new aspect of your technical knowledge, invariably informs the other.

I’m sure that one can approach photography from a purely aesthetic and instinctive level, where you discover yourself through a visual education. Or you can come to it from another angle, where you become fascinated with the technical nuances of the tools used. But whatever way your introduction to photography, you won’t spend long in either camp without having to know the other.

For me, my earliest memories of photography came not of photographs, but of cameras. I strongly remember my older brother Len, always having cameras, lens, flashes and other alluringly heavy, metal objects of technical desire. I would play with them on a purely object level, never really caring what they were meant for at that time. I guess that shows that I might always be a designer first and a photographer second. Unfortunately for my brother, my fascination lead to lots of screwed up, misaligned, sometimes broken camera equipment. Just about every time I got my hands of his gear, I’d get something all misfired and half cocked. Ugh. My brother and all of his equipment was my archetype of a photographer and a photographer’s gear.

Over the last 4 years I’ve had a slow progression of confidence in myself as a photographer. Recently, I worked on my most significant photographic project to date and through it I learnt many, many things. Some were about how to interact with people that I’m about to photograph; some were with how to use available light for portraits. But one of the most important things I learnt was being able to say, “I can do this… I could be really good at this”.

Unfortunately, one of the other things I learnt was that my relationship with my camera, my Nikon D70, has changed for ever. I kept fighting with my camera’s auto focus capabilities and poor low light response throughout the trip. And even though I’ve shot thousands and thousands of frames with it until this project I’d never had to use it under pressure. All my previous photography had never been for anyone else’s consumption. What I discovered was that my most reliable photographic tool, my most trusted photo buddy was going to be retired soon… It was time to say hello to my new friend, the Canon EOS 1D Mark III.